6 6 6 - The Enigma


Welberth Warbler Martins Ferreira




Here it is the enigma: does an exist beast and its name is it 666, who is the beast ?

for now! we know ourselves perfectly albeit in that planeta não it exists any to be i live with numeric name, because everybody is they alive they possess literal names.

Now! We know perfectly albeit in that planet it doesn't exist any to be i live with numeric name, because everybody is they alive they possess literal names. even those which don't possess life possess literal names or in the worst of the numeric hipóteses alfa (these names are never 100% numeric).

This way, the beast's name is not 666 but yes six hundred and sixty six. however it is easy to notice that in this universe any creature doesn't exist whose name has so much repeated letters as they exist in six hundred and sixty six. we can conclude then that the beast's name is not 666 written for extensive with whole its letters, but yes 666 written for extensive without the repeated letters.

If we remove the repeated letters of six hundred and sixty six, we will have the following:

thus, writing for extensive in portuguese 666 so that the letters one doesn't repeat we have

s - e - i - c - n - t - o - a

that is to say all these letters, when combined of the right way, they create the words which define the beast's name. in these circumstances it is possible to form the following sentence:

it 's an eco

the echo is nothing else than our own voice.

If its eyes are prohibited and its father to begin converçar with you, will you be capable to recognize that voice as being its father's voice? yes or not? if its mother begins converçar with you, will you be capable to recognize that voice as being its mother's voice? yes or not? if its brother or sister to begin converçar with you, will you be capable to recognize that voice as being its sister's voice or brother? yes or not? it is already very clear that its voice nothing else is of it its own wallet of identity, and as who is in its wallet of identity it is you same, we can conclude that the beast is you.

eis that appears now the subject of the question: do you agree that you are a beast? yes or not?

If my calculations are correct, its answer was not, what takes us to a new enigma: how does it can you to say that is not the beast if the beast's enigma this affirming that the beast you are? the human being is identified by its actions, in other words, if you act then as a clown of circus you are a clown, if you act then as a wise person you are a wise person and if you act then as a beast you are a beast. to act as a beast it is necessary to do exactly that that the more beast likes to do, and as the one that the more beast likes to do you is to sin, we can conclude then that the beast is actually all the people that are in sin.

Just to refresh its memory: is to lie sinned? Yes or not?

Is the laziness sinned? Yes or not?

Is the gluttony sinned? Yes or not? Like you can see it is not very difficult to act as a beast.

obs.: favor not to confuse estár in sin with it was in sin. that that made a sin and asked to deus perdão for the made sins, it was in sin in the moment in that it made the sin, for the fact of having been sorry of having sinned and to have asked for forgiveness to god for the made sins, it was forgiven by god, what means that this person is not more in sin and therefore you is not seen for god as a more beast yes like son of god. when being recognized like son of god, you get to escape of the more hell it doesn't get to escape of its responsibilities. you are responsible for its acts and will have to answer for them in the day of the final judgement. already that that sinned is been was not sorry of the made sins, not only it was in sin in the moment in that the sin was made as it is still in sin. this creature is seen by god i don't eat its son, but yes like the beast's son, and therefore you is a beast, and the beast's place is in the hell.